« September SongDust Busters Needed »

Lower Manhattan, Our Gettysburg?

08/18/10 | by Carolyn Jackson [mail] | Categories: Barack Obama, Religion, Islam

Some very foolish things have been said about the proposed Cordoba Muslim Cultural Center in downtown Manhattan, the majority of them, it seems to me by people who wouldn’t know how to find the site if they were dropped off at the closest subway stop.

Follow up:

While it’s predictable that Republicans and Tea Party adherents would take a stance against anything that might involve a lot of dark-skinned men milling around, I am just as offended by comments like those made by Senator Harry Reid and New York Governor David Paterson, and hinted at by President Obama, that while Muslims have a right to build a place of worship and education, they should refrain from doing so in close proximity to the site that was devastated by terrorists who claimed to be Muslim in September 2001 because it demonstrates a lack of sensitivity to the families of those who lost their lives there.

Not surprisingly, the loudest voices have not been those of the survivors but people with tenuous ties to the events who crave media attention.

I call their attention to a speech made some years ago by a Republican president at the site of an even larger loss of American lives. The Civil War was not yet over in November 1863 when Abraham Lincoln dedicated the cemetery at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Three thousand one hundred fifty-five Union soldiers and 4,408 Confederate soldiers breathed their last breaths in that place. Although the cemetery was intended as a memorial to the Union dead, Confederate bodies were not shipped back to their states for seven years.

When Lincoln penned his brief remarks, it was scarcely four months since the battle ended. Yet Lincoln did not berate or demonize the enemy. In a manner not unlike that with which many people view the attacks of 9/11, Lincoln saw the war as a test of whether a nation “conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal…can long endure.”

But Lincoln didn’t overvalue the efforts to create a shrine; in his eyes, that had already been done: “we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract,” he said.

All the bellowing and snide remarks about the proposed institution do nothing to honor our own dead. In a sense they still walk among us as we go about our lives.

When Lincoln said, “It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced,” I don’t think he imagined some of the hideous events that followed the discontinuation of Reconstruction. I think he envisioned a nation whole and free. Sadly, in an attempt to appease the Southern white establishment, we compromised that vision, and the vitriol lives on.

It is not enough for the President to invoke the Constitution. Instead, he needs to remind us that we are all a part of one nation, and Muslims have been part of it since the outset. We conveniently forget that many of the Africans who were enslaved on these shores were in fact Muslim; that many of them converted to Christianity does nothing to diminish that.

All of us might recommit ourselves to Lincoln’s closing words:

“It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us –

“that from these honored dead we take increased devotion

“to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion –

“that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain,

“that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom,

“and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.”

On September 12, 2001, we had the sympathies of most people on the planet. How many more do we want to alienate?

9 comments

Comment from: Hanan Watson [Visitor]
Carolyn: This is so moving and so true...
08/18/10 @ 19:18
Comment from: Deborah Taylor [Visitor]
Thank you for the historic reminders, Carolyn. Lincoln spoke to his time directly and wisely, and to ours, and at the ultimate cost. Would we in our time make him pay the ultimate cost again?
08/18/10 @ 19:48
Comment from: Claris [Visitor] · http://kvickthoughts.blogspot.com
Well said.
08/19/10 @ 10:47
Comment from: Peggy Montgomery [Visitor]
Carolyn, your wise and profound message needs to be read by the world. How about starting with The NYTimes Op Ed page?
08/20/10 @ 06:02
Comment from: Sue Macy [Visitor]
I agree. More people should see this clear-headed analysis. Excellent piece.
08/20/10 @ 07:13
Comment from: Phoebe Hoss [Visitor] Email · http://www.phoebehoss.com
Me, too. Get it to the Times. More people need to be reminded of Lincoln's words and attitude. Thanks for making that cogent connection.
08/20/10 @ 07:48
Comment from: Leonora Morrison [Visitor]
Carolyn, this is brilliant. It could not be better stated. This should on every page in this fragmented land, and some in Europe!
08/22/10 @ 00:38
Comment from: Toad734 [Visitor] Email · http://www.toadthoughts.blogspot.com
Hi Carolyn,

For those on the right who are opposed to freedom of religion:

1.It's no different than what the NRA did in the 90s when they held conventions in cities after there had been school shootings and I don't recall anyone on the right condemning them.
2. It's not an actual mosque.
3. It's not going to be built on ground zero. Its being built at the site of a former Burlington Coat Factory. In fact, it's not going to be built on any site of a building that has recently been demolished or destroyed as there is a building currently occupying that property right now and is in fact 2 blocks away from ground zero.
4. This is not the same sect of Islam that you are used to seeing on TV; they are not Wahhabists. Its more like saying Jews for Jesus or Kabbalah is Judaism or that Christian Scientists are "Christians".
5.Al-Qaeda is not building this community center. Al-Qaeda is who attacked us, not Islam.
6. See the 1st Amendment

Also, it's not like the right is opposing this because it's near ground zero (where another Mosque has existed for quite some time), this is happening in Tennessee and even California of all places where people are opposing the building of mosques and Islamic community centers.

So does this mean Catholic Churches shouldn't be built near playgrounds?

And since the right wants to take away someone elses 1st amendment rights, how would they feel about someone taking away their 2nd Amendment rights?

There are at least 3 mosques and or Muslim community centers within walking distance of my house and I have never been blown up by a suicide bomb or been subjected to Sharia laws. About the only impact it has had on me is that I have a variety of Falafel stands to chose from. In fact, these are all located in or very near to a gay neighborhood and none of them have been Jihaded either. And if I recall, the day of the pride parade it wasn't Mulims out protesting, it was all Christians who were being intolerant of others.
08/23/10 @ 07:37
Comment from: Marge Byers [Visitor]
Thank you for this powerful and apt comparison. It is a breath taking reminder of how much we have lost.
08/24/10 @ 07:16

This post has 34 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)

Random reflections on politics, the media, political activism, women's lives and spirituality, often inspired by travel, cultural events or what I read.

February 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Search

Categories

The requested Blog doesn't exist any more!

XML Feeds

multiblog engine